P R E F
A C E
AFTER
much expectation, and many enquiries, the last volume of the late reverend Mr.
Henry's Exposition now appears in the world. The common disadvantages that
attend posthumous productions will doubtless be discerned in this; but we
hope, though there are diversities of gifts, there will be found to be the
same spirit. Some of the relations and hearers of that excellent person have
been at the pains of transcribing the notes they took in short-hand of this
part of the holy scripture, when expounded by him in his family or in the
congregation; they have furnished us with very good materials for the
finishing of this great work, and we doubt not but that the ministers who have
been concerned in it have made that use of those assistances which may entitle
this composure to the honour of Mr. Henry's name; and, if so, they can very
willingly conceal their own.
The New Testament may be very properly divided into two parts, the one historical
the other epistolary. It is the exposition of the latter we now
recommend, and shall offer some thoughts on the epistolary way of writing in
general, and then proceed to observe the divine authority of these epistles,
together with the style, matter, method, and design of them, leaving what
might be said concerning the several inspired penmen to the prefaces
appertaining to the particular epistles.
As to the epistolary way of writing, it may be sufficient to observe that it
has usually three properties:--It may in some things be more difficult
to be understood, but then it is very profitable, and very pleasant;
these will be found to be the properties of these sacred letters. We shall
meet with things not easy to be understood, especially in some parts of them,
where we cannot so well discover the particular occasions on which they were
written or the questions or matters of fact to which they refer; but this is
abundantly compensated by the profit which will accrue to those that read them
with due attention. They will find the strongest reasoning, the most moving
expostulations, and warm and pressing exhortations, mixed with seasonable
cautions and reproofs, which are all admirably fitted to impress the mind with
suitable sentiments and affections. And how much solid pleasure and delight
must this afford to persons of a serious and religious spirit, especially when
they wisely and faithfully apply to themselves what they find to suit their
case! Thus they will appear to be as truly written to them as if their names
were superscribed on them. It is natural for us to be very much pleased in
perusing a wise and kind letter, full of instruction and comfort, sent to us
by an absent friend: how then should we prize this part of holy scripture,
when we consider herein that our God and Saviour has written these letters to
us, in which we have the great things of his law and gospel, the things
that belong to our peace! By these means not only the holy apostles, being
dead, yet speak, but the Lord of the prophets and apostles continues to
speak and write to us; and while we read them with proper affections, and
follow them with suitable petitions and thanksgivings, a blessed
correspondence and intercourse will be kept up between heaven and us, while we
are yet sojourners in the earth.
But it is the divine inspiration and authority of these epistles we are
especially concerned to know; and it is of the last importance that in this
our minds be fully established. And we have strong and clear evidence that
these epistles were written by the apostles of our Lord Jesus, and that they
(like the prophets of the Old Testament) spoke and wrote as they were moved
by the Holy Ghost. These epistles have in all ages of the church been
received by Christians as a part of those holy scriptures that are given by
inspiration of God, and are profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for
correction, and for instruction in righteousness, and are able to make us wise
to salvation through faith which is in Jesus Christ; they are part of that
perpetual universal rule of faith and life which contains doctrines and
revelations we are bound to believe with a divine faith, as coming from the
God of truth, and duties to be practised by us in obedience to the will of
God, acknowledging that the things written therein are the commandments of
God, 1 Cor. xiv. 37. And, for the same reasons that lead us to acknowledge
the other parts of the Bible to be the word of God, we must own these to be so
too. If there is good reason (as indeed there is) to believe that the books of
Moses were written by inspiration of God, there is the same reason to believe
that the writings of the prophets were also from God, because the law and the
prophets speak the same things, and such things as none but the Holy Ghost
could teach; and, if we must with a divine faith believe the Old Testament to
be a revelation from God, we cannot with any good reason question the divine
authority of the New, when we consider how exactly the histories of the one
agree with the prophecies of the other, and how the dark types and shadows of
the law are illustrated and accomplished in the gospel. Nor can any person who
pretends to believe the divine authority of the historical part of the New
Testament, containing the Gospels and the Acts, with good reason question the
equal authority of the epistolary part; for the subject-matter of all these
epistles, as well as of the sermons of the apostles, is the word of God
(Rom. x. 17; 1 Thess. ii. 13; Col. i. 25), and the gospel of God (Rom.
xv. 16; 2 Cor. xi. 7), and the gospel of Christ, 2 Cor. ii. 12. We are
built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself
being the chief corner-stone; and, as Moses wrote of Christ, so did all
the prophets, for the Spirit of Christ in them did testify of him. And the
apostles confirmed what Christ himself began to teach, God also bearing
them witness with signs, and wonders, and divers miracles, and gifts of the
Holy Ghost, according to his will, Heb. ii. 3, 4. The manifestation of God
in the flesh, and the things he began both to do and teach until the day in
which he was taken up, together with his sufferings unto death, and his
resurrection (which things are declared to us, and are firmly to be believed,
and strictly regarded by us), do give us an ample account of the way of life
and salvation by Jesus Christ; but still it was the will of our blessed Lord
that his apostles should not only publish his gospel to all the world, but
also that, after his resurrection, they should declare some things more
plainly concerning him than he thought fit to do while he was here on earth,
for which end he promised to send his Holy Spirit to teach them all things,
to bring all things to their remembrance which he had spoken unto them,
John xiv. 26. For he told them (John xvi. 12, 13), I have many things to
say unto you, but you cannot bear them now; but when he, the Spirit of truth,
is come, he shall lead you into all truth, and shall show you things to come.
Accordingly we find there was a wonderful effusion of the Holy Spirit upon the
apostles (who in these epistles are called the servants, ambassadors, and
ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God), under
whose infallible guidance they preached the gospel, and declared the whole
counsel of God, and that with amazing courage and success, Satan every where
falling down before them like lightning from heaven. That in preaching the
gospel they were under the influence of the infallible Spirit is undeniable,
from the miraculous gifts and powers they received for their work,
particularly that gift of tongues so necessary for the publication of the
gospel throughout the world to nations of different languages; nor must we
omit that mighty power that accompanied the word preached, bringing multitudes
to the obedience of faith, notwithstanding all opposition from earth and hell,
and the potent lusts in the hearts of those who were turned from idols to
serve the living God, and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from
the dead, even Jesus, that delivered us from the wrath to come. Now that
they were under the same mighty influence in writing these epistles as in
preaching cannot be denied. Such infallible assistance seems to be as needful
at least to direct their writing as their preaching, considering that these
epistles were written to keep in memory those things that had been delivered
by word of mouth (2 Pet. i. 15), and to rectify the mistakes that might arise
about some expressions that had been used in preaching (2 Thess. ii. 2), and
were to remain as a standing rule and record to which believers were to
appeal, for defending the truth and discovering error, and a proper means to
transmit the truths of the gospel to posterity, even to the end of time.
Besides, the writers of these epistles have declared that what they wrote was
from God: now they must know whether they had the special assistance of the
divine Spirit or no, in their writing as well as preaching; and they in all
things appear to have been men of such probity that they would not dare to say
they had the Spirit of God when they had it not, or if they so much as doubted
whether they had it or not; yea, they are careful, when they speak their own
private opinion, or only under some common influence, to tell the world that
not the Lord, but they, spoke those things, but that in the rest
it was not they but the Lord, 1 Cor. vii. 10, 12, &c. And the apostle Paul
makes the acknowledgment of this their inspiration to be a test to try those
that pretended to be prophets or spiritual: Let them (says he) acknowledge
that the things I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord, 1 Cor.
xiv. 37. And the apostle Peter gives this as the reason of his writing, that
those he wrote to might after his decease have those things always in
remembrance (2 Pet. i. 15), which afterwards he calls the commandment
of the apostles of the Lord (ch. iii. 1, 2), and so of the Lord
himself. And the apostles John declareth (1 John iv. 6), We are of God; he
that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us; by this we
know the Spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
As to the style of these epistles, though it be necessary we should believe a
divine influence superintending the several writers of them, yet it is not
easy to explain the manner of it, nor to determine whether and in what
particulars the words they wrote were dictated to them by the Holy Spirit, as
mere amanuenses, or how far their own memories, and reasoning
faculties, and other natural or acquired endowments, were employed under the
inspection of the Spirit. We must believe that these holy men spoke and wrote as
they were moved by the Holy Ghost, that he put them on and assisted them
in this work. It is very probable that sometimes he not only suggested the
very thoughts in their minds, but put words into their mouths, and always
infallibly guided them into all truth, both when they expounded the scriptures
of the Old Testament and when they gave rules for our faith and practice in
the gospel church state. And yet perhaps it may be allowed, without any
diminution to the authority of these epistles, that the penmen of them made
some use of their own reasoning powers and different endowments in their
manner of writing, as well as of their different sorts of chirography; and
that by this we are to account for that difference of style which has been
observed between the writings of Paul, who was brought up at the feet of
Gamaliel, and those of Peter and John, who were fishermen. The like difference
may be discerned between the style of the prophet Isaiah, who was educated in
a court, and that of Amos, who was one of the herdsmen of Tekoa. However, the
best way to understand these scriptures aright is not to criticise too nicely
upon the words and phrases, but to attend carefully to the drift and design of
these inspired writers in them.
The subject-matter of these epistles is entirely conformable to the
rest of the scriptures. In them we find frequent reference to some passages of
the Old Testament, and explanations of them: in the epistle to the Hebrews we
have the best exposition of the Levitical law. Indeed the New Testament refers
to, and in a manner builds upon, the Old, showing the accomplishment of all
the ancient promises and prophecies concerning the Messiah, and explains all
the antiquated types and shadows of the good things that were then to come.
But, besides these references to the preceding part of holy writ, in some of
these epistles there are contained prophecies, either wholly new or at least
more largely and plainly revealed, as that in the Revelation concerning
the rise, reign, and fall of antichrist, of which great apostasy we have some
account in 2 Thess. ii. 3, 4, and in 1 Tim. iv. 1-3. And in these epistles we
have several of the great doctrines of the gospel more fully discussed than
elsewhere, particularly the doctrine of original sin, of the sin that dwells
in the regenerate, and of justification by the righteousness of Christ, of the
abolishing of the Jewish rites and ceremonies, of the true nature and design
of the seals of the new covenant, the obligations they bring us under, and
their perpetual use in the Christian church.
The general method of these epistles is such as best serves the end or design
of them, which is indeed the end of the whole scripture--practical godliness,
out of a principle of divine love, a good conscience, and faith unfeigned.
Accordingly most of the epistles begin with the great doctrines of the gospel,
the articles of the Christian faith, which, when received, work by love,
purify the conscience, and produce evangelical obedience; and, after these
principles have been laid down, practical conclusions are drawn and urged from
them. In taking this method there is a regard paid to the nature and faculties
of the soul of man (where the understanding is to lead the way, the will,
affections, and executive powers, to follow after), and to the nature of
religion in general, which is a reasonable service. We are not to be
determined by superstitious fancies, nor by blind passions, but by a sound
judgment and good understanding in the mind and will of God. By this we are
taught how necessary it is that faith and practice, truth and holiness, be
joined together, that the performance of moral duties will never be acceptable
to God, nor available to our own salvation, without the belief of the truth,
since those who make shipwreck of the faith seldom maintain a good conscience,
and the most solemn profession of the faith will never save those that hold
the truth in unrighteousness.
The particular occasions upon which these epistles were written do not so
evidently appear in them all as in some. The first to the Corinthians seems to
have taken its rise from the unhappy divisions that so early rose in the
churches of Christ, through the emulation of the ministers and personal
affections of the people; but it does not confine itself to that subject. That
to the Galatians seems directed chiefly against those judaizing teachers that
went about to draw the Gentile converts away from the simplicity of the gospel
in doctrine and worship. The epistle to the Hebrews is manifestly calculated
to wean the converted Jews from those Mosaical rites and ceremonies for which
they retained too great a fondness, and to reconcile them to the abolition of
that economy. Those epistles that are directed to particular persons more
evidently carry their design in them, which he that runs may read. But this is
certain, none of these epistles are of private interpretation. Most of the
psalms and of the prophecies of the Old Testament were penned or pronounced on
particular occasions, and yet they are of standing and universal use, and very
instructive even to us upon whom the ends of the world have come. And so are
those epistles that seem to have been most limited in the rise and occasion of
them. There will always be need enough to warn Christians against uncharitable
divisions, against corrupting the faith and worship of the gospel; and,
whenever the case is the same, these epistles are as certainly directed to
such churches and persons as if they had been inscribed to them.
These general observations, we suppose, may be sufficient to introduce the
reader into the book itself; let us now take a short view of the whole work,
of which this posthumous piece is the conclusion. It is now about fourteen
years since the first part of this exposition of the Bible was made public. In
five years' time the Old Testament was finished in four volumes. The first
volume of the New Testament was longer in hand; for though the ever-memorable
author was always fully employed in the ordinary work of his ministry, yet
those last years of his life, in which he drew up the exposition upon the
historical part of the New Testament, were less at his own command than any
other had been. His removal to Hackney, his almost continual preaching from
day to day, his journeys to Chester, and the necessity of more frequent visits
to his friends in and about London, together with a gradual sensible decay of
health, will more than excuse the three years' time that passed before that
was finished. And under such difficulties none but a man of his holy zeal,
unwearied industry, and great sagacity, could have gone through such a service
in that space of time. He lived not to see that volume published, though left
by him ready for the press. The church of God was suddenly deprived of one of
the most useful ministers of the age. We have been gathering up the fragments
of those feasts with which he used to entertain his family and friends, in his
delightful work of opening the scriptures. What remains is that we recommend
the whole of this work to the acceptance and blessing of our God and Saviour,
to whose honour and interest it was from the first directed and devoted. We
need not be very solicitous about the acceptance it may meet with in the
world: what has been before published has been received and read with great
pleasure and advantage by the most serious experienced Christians in Great
Britain and Ireland; and the many loud calls there have been for the
publishing of this supplement, and reprinting the whole, leave us no room to
doubt but that it will meet with a hearty welcome. Though it must be
acknowledged that we live in an age which by feeding upon ashes and the wind,
has very much lost the relish of every thing that is spiritual and
evangelical, yet we persuade ourselves there will still be found many who, by
reason of use, have, their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
Those that may think the expository notes too long, especially for family
worship, may easily relieve themselves, either by reading a less part of the
chapter at one time, or by abridging the annotations, and perusing the rest
when they have more leisure; for, though it must be owned they are somewhat
copious, yet we are persuaded that those who peruse them seriously will find
nothing in them superfluous or impertinent; and, if any where some things in
the comment do not seem to flow so naturally and necessarily from the text, we
believe when they are well considered and compared it will appear they come
under the analogy and general reason of the subject, and truly belong to it.
If there be any that think this exposition of the Bible is too plain and
familiar, that it wants the beauties of oratory and the strength of criticism,
we only wish that they will read it over again with due attention, and we are
pretty confident they will find the style natural, clear, and comprehensive;
and we think they will hardly be able to produce one valuable criticism out of
the most learned commentators but they will have it in this exposition, though
couched in plain terms, and not brought in as of a critical nature. No man was
more happy than Mr. Henry in that useful talent of making dark things plain,
while too many, that value themselves upon their criticising faculty, affect
rather to make plain things dark.
But we leave this great and good work to speak for itself, and doubt not but
it will grow in its use and esteem, and will, through the blessing of God,
help to revive and promote family religion and scriptural knowledge, and
support the credit of scripture commentaries, though couched in human
expressions. These have been always accounted the great treasures of the
church, and when done with judgment, have been so far from lessening the
authority of the Bible that they have greatly promoted its honour and
usefulness.
The following are the ministers by whom the Exposition on the Epistolary
writings, and the Revelation, was completed, as given by J. B. Williams, Esq.,
LL.D.,F.S.A., in his Memoirs of the Life, Character, and Writings, of the
Rev. Matthew Henry, 8vo. p. 308.
|
Romans
|
|
Mr.
[afterwards Dr.] John Evans.
|
|
1
Corinthians
|
|
Mr.
Simon Browne.
|
|
2
Corinthians
|
|
Mr.
Daniel Mayo.
|
|
Galatians
|
|
Mr.
Joshua Bayes.
|
|
Ephesians
|
|
Mr.
Samuel Rosewell.
|
|
Philippians
|
}
|
Mr.
[afterwards Dr.] William Harris.
|
|
Colossians
|
|
1
Thessalonians
|
}
|
Mr.
Daniel Mayo.
|
|
2
Thessalonians
|
|
1
Timothy
|
}
|
Mr.
Benjamin Andrews Atkinson.
|
|
2
Timothy
|
|
Titus
|
}
|
Mr.
Jeremiah Smith.
|
|
Philemon
|
|
Hebrews
|
|
Mr.
William Tong.
|
|
James
|
|
Dr.
S. Wright.
|
|
1
Peter
|
|
Mr.
Zec. Merrill.
|
|
2
Peter
|
|
Mr.
Joseph Hill.
|
|
1,
2, and 3 John
|
|
Mr.
John Reynolds, of Shrewsbury.
|
|
Jude
|
|
Mr.
John Billingsley.
|
|
Revelation
|
|
Mr.
William Tong.
|
Contents
|
Next
Section
